Since our project started in 2020, TRANSGOV has participated in a series of important events related to transparency.
At the upcoming Global Conference on Transparency Research in Copenhagen in May 2022, TRANSGOV is participating in an exciting panel on the transformative potential of transparency. The panel grapple with questions related to assumed links to accountable and trustworthy climate action, the promise of digitally-enabled or radical transparency and to what extent countries engage with established transparency arrangements.
On the second day of COP26 Glasgow, TRANSGOV presented at the EU pavilion side event titled “Blindspots of net-zero strategies and how to address them” on the importance of focusing on immediate and ambitious climate action rather than setting lofty long-term net zero targets and relying heavily on negative emissions technology. A recording of the event is available here.
TRANSGOV had a strong presence throughout COP26 in Glasgow, represented by the project’s PhD candidates Max van Deursen and Robert Bergsvik. They focused on all things transparency in the climate negotiations, with a particular attention on GHG emission and climate finance reporting. Watch TRANSGOV vlog coverage of COP26 here.
Further results from TRANSGOV’s investigation into assumed linkages between transparency and accountability in the context of multilateral climate finance reporting was presented during a panel discussion at the European Consortium for Political Research’s 2021 Virtual Conference.
The first results from the TRANSGOV project in relation to the politics of capacity building for transparency in the UNFCCC was presented at the International Studies Association’s 2021 Annual Convention.
The TRANSGOV project research agenda was launched at the Earth System Governance’s Virtual Forum in September 2020. Project lead Dr. Aarti Gupta opened a highly informative discussion between esteemed scholars and practitioners on under what conditions does (what kind of) transparency lead to more accountable, trustworthy and ambitious collective climate action, as is widely assumed? And when is transparency transformative of multilevel climate governance?